Preparing for the arrival of a child is an exciting
time for potential mothers, but there is a lot to consider. Aside from painting
the nursery and learning how to change a diaper, pregnant women and their
partners need to make decisions on how they want to bring their child into the
world. Whether by natural, drug-assisted or surgical means, there are
associated risks and benefits across the board, depending on the circumstances.
In this feature, we examine different birthing methods and their outcomes.
In the past, women gave birth naturally in a sitting position, employing a birthing stool.
Image credit: Eucharius Rösslin, 1513 (Arons, 1994)
Image credit: Eucharius Rösslin, 1513 (Arons, 1994)
Birthing practices and ideologies have gone through many changes
throughout history. In AD 98, a Roman named Soranus wrote an obstetrics
textbook that was widely used until the 16th century.
During
the Middle Ages, the business of childbirth was in the hands of the midwife,
which, in Old English, means "with woman." Pregnant women were
attended by their female friends, relatives and local women who were
experienced in helping with childbirth.
Depictions of labor during this
time usually show women giving birth in an upright sitting position, using a
birthing stool that left space in the seat.
Other
positions during this time typically included half-lying positions or even a
crouching position, and of course, there were no anesthetics available.
However, midwives typically used oils and unguents to help reduce perineal
tearing.
There
was a significant shift in the business of childbirth during the 1700s. Newer
technologies played a role, as did male midwives or physicians, who began
taking over for the female midwife. In fact, during this time, female midwives
lost much of their status and were portrayed as unhygienic and unenlightened,
and they were even associated with witchcraft.
This
is the era that heralded the use of certain instruments, such as the forceps
and other more destructive tools like the vectis - a lever-type tool for
altering the baby's position - and a crochet tool with a hook, used for
extracting a dead fetus from the mother's body.
The
20th century brought childbirth from the home to the hospital, where hi-tech
devices and procedures - such as the fetal heart rate monitor, cesarean
sections (C-sections) and epidurals - became commonplace. By the late 1970s in
the US, home birth rates fell to around 1%.
The rise of the C-section
Fast forward to the present day, and the business of childbirth
looks very different from its early origins. The Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC) report that there were over 3.9 million births registered
in the US in 2012. Of these, over 2.6 million were delivered vaginally, and
nearly 1.3 million were delivered via C-section.
Additionally,
the vast majority of these births took place in a hospital; only 1.4% of
deliveries occurred elsewhere. Of these, over 65% took place at home and 29%
occurred in a birthing center.
In 2009, the total C-section
delivery rate reached an all-time high, at 32.9%, which represented a 60%
increase from the most recent low in 1996, at 20.7% of all births.
Given this significant spike, the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued clinical guidelines in February of this year to reduce the
occurrence of C-sections that were not medically indicated, as well as labor
induction before 39 weeks. These guidelines included initiatives aimed at
improving prenatal care, changing hospital policies and educating the public.
C-sections
are deemed medically necessary when circumstances make a vaginal birth risky
for the mother or baby. For example, physicians or midwives may recommend one
when the fetus is in the breech position - when the baby's buttocks or feet are
facing the pelvis rather than the head - or when the placenta is covering the
cervix - called placenta previa.
We recently reported on a study published in August of this year
that suggested breech babies have a higher risk of death from vaginal delivery
than C-section.
C-section risks
However, some women opt for elective C-sections when there is no
medical reason to do so. Speaking with Medical
News Today, Dr. Sinéad O'Neill, of the Irish Centre for Fetal and
Neonatal Translational Research, cautioned that this procedure is a serious
abdominal surgery that carries certain risks:
"For the mother, these may include infection,
clots, hemorrhage, a longer recovery period, and although rare, an increased
risk of uterine rupture in subsequent deliveries. For cesarean section babies,
respiratory problems requiring treatment in the neonatal intensive care unit
are more common."
"It must be stressed that a cesarean section is an abdominal surgery, and all surgeries carry risks," said Dr. Sinéad O'Neill.
She added that women who
undergo a C-section may also experience chronic pelvic pain, and some of their
babies are at increased risk of developing asthma, diabetes and being overweight.
In July, Dr. O'Neill and her colleagues published a study in PLOS Medicine that suggested a small but significant increased risk of a subsequent stillbirth or ectopic pregnancy
following a C-section in a woman's first
birth.
In detail, the team found that
women who had a C-section in their first live birth had a 14% increased rate of
stillbirth and a 9% increased risk of ectopic pregnancy in their next
pregnancy, compared with women who had a vaginal delivery.
The
researchers concluded their study by noting that their findings "will
better inform women of the benefits and risks associated with all modes of
delivery and help women and their partners make a more informed decision
regarding mode of delivery based on their individual pregnancy
circumstances."
Following on from their study published in July, Dr. O'Neill and
colleagues conducted research on effects of C-section and fertility - published
in the journal Human Reproduction - which suggested thatwomen with a primary C-section
were up to 39% less likely to have a subsequent live birth than women who delivered vaginally.
However,
Dr. O'Neill added that "this is most likely due to maternal choice to
delay or avoid subsequent deliveries as evidenced in the decreasing hazard
ratios according to type of cesarean section."
In an ACOG report on safe prevention of primary
C-section delivery, researchers note that "for most
pregnancies, which are low-risk, C-section delivery appears to pose greater
risk of maternal morbidity and mortality than vaginal delivery."
Although
the National Institutes of Health note that vaginal births after cesarean
(VBAC) are successful 60-80% of the time, Dr. O'Neill says that failed VBACs
are associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture, and C-sections become
riskier with each subsequent surgery.
"Ultimately,
midwives and obstetricians must be able to discuss with women their options for
birth after a cesarean section and whether a normal birth would be possible
drawing from the evidence base and knowledge, and taking into account a woman's
medical history," she told us.
To drug or not to drug?
During the active labor stage, contractions begin to get stronger, longer and closer together.
Another
aspect of childbirth that pregnant women face is how to manage pain. The
Bible's Book of Genesis has God condemning Eve to painful childbirth for eating
the forbidden fruit ("In pain you shall bring forth children"), but
modern medicine has uncovered causal biological mechanisms behind the pressure
women experience during labor.
There are three stages of labor:
1.
Stage 1: early, active labor
2.
Stage 2: the birth of the baby
3.
Stage 3: delivery of the placenta.
The
first stage entails a thinning and opening phase when the cervix dilates and
thins out to encourage the baby to move down into the birth canal. This is when
women will experience mild contractions in regular intervals that will be less
than 5 minutes apart toward the end of early labor.
According to the Mayo Clinic, for
first-time moms, the average length of this early labor is between 6-12 hours,
and it typically shortens with subsequent deliveries.
Most
women report that early labor is not especially uncomfortable, and some even
continue with their daily activities.
During
the active labor portion of the first stage, however, the contractions begin to
get stronger, longer and closer together. Cramping and nausea are common
complaints, as is increasing back pressure. This is the time when most women
head to the place in which they want to give birth - whether it is at a
hospital, birthing center or in a designated area at home.
Active
labor can last up to 8 hours, and this is typically when most women who desire
an epidural request one.
Spinal and epidural anesthesia
are medicines that numb parts of the body in order to block pain. Administered
through a catheter placed in the back or shots in or around the spine, these
medicines allow the woman to stay awake during labor.
Though these medicines are considered generally safe, they do
carry certain risks and complications, such as allergic reactions, bleeding
around the spinal column, drop in blood pressure, spinal infections, nerve damage,
seizures and severe headache.
Epidural risks
In May of this year, MNT reported on a study
conducted by Dr. Robert D'Angelo, of Wake Forest University School of Medicine
in North Carolina, and colleagues, which examined the serious complications of anesthesia.
These
complications included:
§ High
neuraxial block - an unexpected high level of anesthesia that develops in the
central nervous system
§ Respiratory
arrest in labor and delivery
§ Unrecognized
spinal catheter - an undetected infusion of local anesthetic through an
accidental puncture of an outer spinal cord membrane.
After examining data on more
than 257,000 deliveries between 2004-09, the researchers found that there were
only 157 complications reported, 85 of which were anesthesia-related.
They
concluded that, given the large sample size, anesthesia complications during
childbirth are "very rare." Though an aim of their study was to
identify risk factors associated with the complications in order to devise
formal practice guidelines, because the complications linked to anesthesia were
so rare, there were too few complications in each category to identify the risk
factors.
Dr. D'Angelo told MNT that, following on from
their research, the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP)
and the Anesthesia Quality Institute (AQI) have agreed to work together in
developing a national serious complication registry for obstetric anesthesia.
He
added that the SOAP Serious Complication Taskforce have developed a draft
listing serious complications linked to anesthesia, and that AQI have
incorporated this information into their website, which is undergoing final
testing.
When
asked the question of how, in light of other epidural side effects - such as it
interfering with the natural birth process or slowing dilation - he would advise
women contemplating epidural or natural birth, Dr. D'Angelo told us:
"Unfortunately, childbirth is very painful and
no modality relieves labor pain as effectively as epidural analgesia. We do our
best to educate patients about the risks and benefits of epidural analgesia,
support and encourage natural childbirth when they are considering this option
and make ourselves available should they change their minds as labor
progresses."
He added that research suggests epidurals only slow the first
stage of labor by 45 minutes and the second stage of labor "by about 15
minutes."
What can natural and alternative birthing methods offer?
In
the wake of increased C-section rates and women opting for medicine-induced
pain relief, there are still women who want to do things the natural way - or
as close to it as possible.
For
such women, there are a number of different options that can help to ease the
pain of labor naturally and even prevent certain negative outcomes.
In a study on yoga during pregnancy published in the journal Complementary Therapies in
Clinical Practice, the researchers note that the stress of labor itself can cause changes in a birthing mother's body:
"Childbirth pain evokes a generalized stress
response, which has widespread physiological effects on a woman's parturient
and fetus. Maternal catecholamine production increases, which affects the labor
process by reducing the strength, duration and coordination of uterine
contractions."
By managing this stress response, laboring women "have been
able to transcend pain and experience psychological and spiritual
comfort," the researchers add.
In their study, they found that an experimental group of women
who were randomized to participate in a yoga program during gestation had higher levels of maternal comfort
during labor, experienced less labor pain, and had a shorter duration of the
first stage of labor as well as the total time of labor, compared with a
control group that did not participate in the yoga program.
Hypnosis for pain relief
Another study that investigated the effect of hypnosis on labor and
birth outcomes in
pregnant adolescents found that the hypnosis group showed better outcomes in
terms of complicated deliveries, surgical procedures and length of hospital
stay, compared with a control group.
The researchers from
that study - published in the Journal of Family Practice and
led by Dr. Paul G. Schauble - note that hypnosis has been used for pain control
during labor and delivery for more than a century, but that the introduction of
anesthetics during the late 19th century led to its decline.
"The use of
hypnosis in preparing the patient for labor and delivery is based on the
premise that such preparation reduces anxiety, improves pain tolerance (lowering the need
for medication), reduces birth complications, and promotes a rapid recovery
process," they add.
Through this method,
participants gain a sense of active participation and control by learning about
the birthing process and alternative ways to produce anesthesia within the body
naturally, through the release of endorphins - pain-fighting neurotransmitters.
Because water has endorphin-releasing effects on the body, many
women also opt to combine their hypnosis method with a water birth, which
employs the use of a birthing pool.
"Research done
thus far indicates that the use of hypnosis consistently reduces anesthesia complications
and facilitates a reduction in discomfort and medication during the labor and
delivery process," Dr. Schauble told MNT.
He added:
"I would strongly encourage women who were
currently developing their birth plans to consider the addition of hypnosis as
a means of preparing for the labor delivery process, thus increasing the
likelihood of a comfortable and healthy birthing process."
In the UK and the US,
a method called HypnoBirthing is taught by practitioners in
various areas.
Though there are a number of different options women can
consider for their birth plans, experts from all approaches are in agreement
that women should educate themselves and speak with their midwives or physicians
in order to determine the course that is best for them
0 comments:
Post a Comment